beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.11.13 2013고단5213

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 4, 2013, the Defendant was employed on May 4, 2013, on the street in front of the H I restaurant located in Busan, Seo-gu B, Busan, the victim J made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would find employment of 1 million won as entertainment expenses by having her friends work in the Sirara vehicle company, and her friends work in the city.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention and ability to find the victim's children in the above company because the defendant did not have any person who is aware of the Sille Motor Vehicle in the Changwon.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one million won in cash from the victim’s occupation.

2. On May 4, 2013, the Defendant, at around 14:00 on the same day, made a false statement to the effect that “A person would pay money to the said victim individually. A person would lend KRW 600,000 to another person.”

However, while the defendant borrowed money from bonds to 22 million won, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed money from the victim due to no special property or income.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 600,000 won in cash from the victim’s position.

3. On May 6, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement on May 6, 2013, 201, stating that “The Defendant shall additionally enter money to find employment for the young children,” regardless of the fact that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to find employment for the young children, such as the above paragraph (1).”

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received one million won in cash from the victim’s occupation.

4. On May 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around May 10, 2013, the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, even though he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the money; (b) on May 10, 2013, the Defendant was personally paid to the victim even if he/she borrowed money from the victim, such as the foregoing paragraph (2).