The request of the applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. From April 22, 2015 to August 13, 2015, the Defendant, for delivery purposes, served as a home-based engineer from the victim D Co., Ltd., Ltd., the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim of the victim C, who was in charge of delivery duties.

While the Defendant received from the injured party the Epoter 2 cooling tower from the victim, and kept it for business purposes, the Defendant embezzled the Epool on August 13, 2015 on the ground that he/she did not comply with the request for return from the injured party on or around August 13, 2015.

2. On November 2015, 2015, the Defendant embezzled the delivery articles, served as a stack engineer at the Hanwon F’s business office located in Suwon-si from the first police officer to the first police officer on February 2016, and took charge of delivery affairs.

On January 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around January 11, 2016, at the market price entrusted with the delivery of the family delivery set at KRW 2,330,000 at G Co., Ltd., the Defendant, without delivering it, embezzled it at his own discretion without delivering it for the purpose of delivery.

From that time until February 13, 2016, the Defendant embezzled delivery goods equivalent to KRW 4,909,000, which were in custody in the course of business four times, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table, in the same manner as the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. One-time protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the accused;

1. Each police statement made against H and B;

1. Each investigation report (to submit telephone conversations, door-to-door delivery data, victim B telephone investigation, data facsimile);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a service contract, an automobile registration certificate, Kakao Stockholm conversation, inquiry into the transport place, inquiry into the details of registration, cargo tracking, and application of the ear delivery system;

1. Relevant Article 356 of the Criminal Act, Articles 355 (1) and 355 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 32 (1) 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuit by which an application for compensation is dismissed;