However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the owner of B Abea car.

On August 13, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 from the Jeonju District Court to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and on March 4, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3,50,000 as a fine of KRW 3,50,00 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support for the development

On April 23, 2017, the Defendant, from around 06:30 to around 07:05, driven the said vehicle at a distance of about 15 km to the street in front of the parking lot A C while departing from the water source transfer 0.136% under the influence of alcohol during blood while driving the said vehicle at a distance of about 15 km from the water source transfer c.136%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Statement report on the circumstances of the driver at home;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history;

1. The provision of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of imprisonment for a crime under the relevant provision of the Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act - Reasons for the protection and observation of an order to attend a lecture, the fact that the defendant has had the power to be punished for driving under drinking, but again commits the crime of driving under drinking, the favorable circumstances: The fact that there is no history of punishment exceeding fines, and that there