If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around 23:50 on May 21, 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim B was ordered to pay the alcohol value at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim B in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, and he was ordered to pay the price, and thereby, he did not pay the above amount of monetary benefits, even though he did not receive food and alcohol equivalent to KRW 32,00,000 in total from the victim, and did not pay the price.

2. On May 31, 2012, the Defendant, against the victim E, obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount because he/she did not pay the price despite having no intention or ability to pay the drinking value in “G” operated by the victim E in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as if he/she would pay the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. The police statement of B and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a statement of receipts and alcohol values;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;