2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to confession of and reflects on the crime of this case, but the defendant had already been punished four times prior to the crime of this case (one suspended sentence, one time of imprisonment with prison labor, and three times). In addition, if the Busan High Court sentenced on August 25, 201 to two years and six months for the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc."), on December 2, 2012, after the execution of the sentence was completed on December 2, 2012, the defendant committed the crime of this case, which constitutes a repeated crime, again again for two months and more, the amount of the penphone, which was offered for the crime of this case, is reasonable. The crime of this case includes not only the act of medication and possession of Phphone, but also the crime of delivery of Phphone, and if the defendant's age, character, and environment conditions for the punishment of this case and arguments are considered to be too unfair, the judgment of the court below is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.