가. 피고가 2019. 5. 31. 원주시청 옥외 주차장( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 주차장’ 이라 한다 )에서 B 팰 이세 이드 차량( 이하 ‘ 피고 차량’ 이라 한다) 을 주차하기 위하여 후진하던 중 후방의 태양 관전 열 판 기둥에 피고 차량의 뒷부분이 부딪쳐 차량 뒷 유리가 파손되는 사고( 이하 ‘ 이 사건 사고 ’라고 한다) 가 발생하였다.

B. While the Defendant was parked in the front line of the parking zone of the instant parking lot, the said solar heat pole was set up in the direction of the parking zone, which is located in the direction of the parking zone. However, in a case where a UV vehicle, such as the Defendant’s vehicle, which was higher than that of the instant parking lot, is parked in line with the parking zone, the lower part of the vehicle’s lower part and the lower part of the parking zone, can be shocked by the columns of the board of the front line of the said shape.

(c)

B. Although the instant parking lot structure is likely to cause an accident, the instant parking lot did not have any guidelines, warnings, etc. to prevent the occurrence of the accident in the parking zone, in order to prevent the accident.

(d)

On the other hand, the defendant suffered damages from the costs of 367,940 won for medical treatment, and 651,200 won for vehicle repair costs.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including branch numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In the event that the Plaintiff recognized the defects in the installation and management of the instant parking lot as a manager of the instant parking lot, the Plaintiff is liable to compensate the Defendant for the damages incurred by the Defendant.

Since the plaintiff is a person, the plaintiff is responsible for compensating the defendant for damages caused by the accident of this case.

However, in light of the circumstances of the accident in this case recognized earlier, the defendant's negligence, which neglected the duty of late parking, shall be limited to 60% of the plaintiff's liability.

Next, it is recognized that the damage suffered by the defendant is advanced to the health care unit.