When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On November 14, 2015, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) around 02:15, at the main point of “D’s operation” of the Victim C located in Tonsan-si B of the Jeonsan-si; (b) on the ground that employees in the process of drinking alcohol do not have a good contact with the Defendant; and (c) on the next table, he/she performed drinking on the tebbbb, the name-free customers who drink the drinking.

I amba Doz.

“Along with the trial cost,” the victim’s main business was interfered with by force by putting the disturbance, avoiding the disturbance, making the customers in the main place uneasy, and preventing them from entering the main place.

2. The Defendant: (a) at the time and place indicated in the preceding paragraph; (b) at the time and place where the Defendant had five customers, the victim E (45 years old) who was a customer, in order to restrain the Defendant; (c) the business owner C of the place of business; (d) employees F and name in a place where five customers are located; and (e) the Defendant “C typ typ chine.”

I amba Doz.

Bagh Bab

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “a large sound,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police for C and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in a written statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above.