폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.
The above fine shall not be paid by the Defendants.
In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below acquitted the Defendants on the grounds that there is no evidence to acknowledge the facts charged and it is difficult to find the Defendants guilty on the ground that there is no intention to injure. The judgment of the court below is erroneous by misapprehending the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the judgment of the court below are as follows: (a) around 15:30 on June 10, 201, the Defendants: (b) at the large performance hall of the F University G Students Center of the F University, E, the said university, during the meeting of the Japanese Language Department and Emergency General Assembly; (c) Defendant A, at the victim H (the age of 46) who follows the victim’s remarks, spawd and spad the victim’s left hand hand; and (d) Defendant B, upon receiving the said microphone from the Defendant, kn the victim, kn the victim’s left hand hand, and knicked the victim’s “if there is any horse, d.” and knished the victim’s left hand hand.
As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the left-hand freshed fresh and the freshed fresh of salt that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the victim.
The lower court rendered a judgment on the grounds that it is difficult to believe the victim’s statement as it is, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the facts charged, and even if the Defendants suffered injury in the course of debrising the victim, it is difficult to deem the Defendants guilty on the grounds that it is difficult to view that there was an intentional injury on the part of the Defendants, even if the Defendants were to have attempted to inflict an injury on the victim, on the part of the Defendants, on the grounds that: (a) there was a possibility that another injury was caused due to other causes, (b) the circumstance where the medical certificate was issued after the lapse of three months after the medical examination and treatment of the victim, (c) the circumstance where
The legal principles relating to the judgment of the court.