도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】
A. On September 15, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million with a fine of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sungwon District Court’s Sungnam branch on September 15, 201, and a summary order of KRW 2 million with the same crime at the Suwon District Court on July 17, 2013.
B. On August 31, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the early branch of the Chuncheon District Court on August 31, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gangnam Prison on November 20, 201
【Criminal Facts】
[2019 Highest 28]
1. A summary in Gangnam-si B around December 11, 2018 by the Defendant of a violation of the Road Traffic Act;
A car with approximately 800 meters of alcohol level 0.074% under the influence of alcohol level 0.074% from the front of the main point to the front of the Gangwon Yangyang-gun D.
Accordingly, the defendant's above criminal records A.
A person who has violated the prohibition of drunk driving not less than twice as stated in the same paragraph and drives a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.
[2019 Highest 118]
2. Around 09:00 on April 3, 2019, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle with E the Ete-Tech without obtaining a driver’s license from around 1km section from the front of the dwelling place in the F of the Gangwon Yangyang-gun to the front of the same military G road.
[2019 Highest 505]
3. Around 20:00 on November 5, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business, while drinking alcohol in the “J” operated by the victim I in the Gangwon Yangyang-gun H, the Defendant: (a) was the victim, but was refused the victim’s request; (b) was made the victim’s desire to talk; (c) was made the victim; and (d) was made several times with the customer’s hand; and (d) took the customer’s bath to the customer; and (e) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s safeguard business by force over about one hour and ten minutes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A written statement of I;
1. 112 Reports, 112 Reports, reports on the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and circumstantial statements of drinking drivers; and