beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.09.05 2013고정275

명예훼손

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a director of the Incheon Dong-gu E Housing Maintenance Project Association, and Defendant B is an auditor of the above partnership.

On September 20, 201, the Defendants in collusion with F, and even though there was no fact that the victim H was accused of and investigated into the prosecution due to fraud, etc., the fact in the office of the association located in Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G is not being opened to the following grounds: (a) the victim was in collusion with I and J, and as if he was investigated by the prosecution by an act of corruption, it is the title "influence of the union members" as if he was investigated by the prosecution, as if he was investigated by the act of corruption.

Therefore, this minority groups are tending to make a fluent conspiracy with the glusent and ear of the union members in a flusent manner. In recent years, our officers became aware of this flusing, and they were sent this newsletter with the belief that they would inform the union members of the right truth.

As far as the case was drawn up on the basis of a criminal complaint filed by the prosecution, I have drawed the members from an objective point of view.

(m) 2. Currently many irregularitiess are discovered to our associations.

In recent years, our officers are aware that the power of the lawsuit (the management director H, the real estate business owner I, and the president of the maintenance business owner) has been able to play a significant role in the administration of the partnership at the same time, and they were asked the prosecution to investigate the following matters with respect to the corruption that they committed in collusion:

First, there is a fact that the former, in collusion, would cause the association to pay the performance bonus to the association, and there is a fact that they have claimed KRW 610 million.

As a result, the president of a cooperative has investigated the cases of attending various cooperatives, viewing and subscription offices in Seoul, against the cooperative.