2. There are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's attitude to recognize and reflect his/her criminal act, and the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind and suspended execution.

However, in light of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires a simple and strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and that the period during which the Defendant operated the sexual traffic establishments cannot be deemed to be less than the period, and other circumstances that form the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.