From around 2009 to November 201, 2013, the Defendant served as the head of the business division of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., and has been in charge of managing customers and collecting money of the said company.

around 2010, the Defendant collected 5070,000 won from the “F” of the E’s operation in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and used 50,000 won for personal purposes, such as operating expenses of a screen golf practice room operated by the Defendant around that time.

From around that time to October 7, 2013, the Defendant consumed the total amount of KRW 13,3520,000,000 of the funds of the victim company that had been kept in business over 11 times, such as the list of crimes in attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the loan certificate, certificate, copy of passbook, and the statutes on transactions of bank accounts in the name of the suspect;

1. Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. 경합범가중 형법 제37조 전단, 제38조 제1항 제2호, 제50조 양형의 이유 o 법률상 처단형의 범위 : 징역 15년 이하 o 양형기준상 권고형의 범위 : 징역 1년∽3년 [횡령배임범죄군, 제2유형(1억 원 이상, 5억 원 이하), 기본영역] o 선고형의 결정 범행횟수, 범행동기, 횡령액의 규모, 피해자와 미합의, 피고인과 피해자 회사의 실제 사주와의 관계, 초범, 반성 등 이 사건 변론에 나타난 제반 사정을 참작하여 정함. 이상의 이유로 주문과 같이 판결한다.