However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 6. 11. 02:02 경 안산시 단원구 B, 1 층에 있는 ‘C’ 오락실에서 “ 취객 여성이 쓰러져 있다” 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 안산 단원 경찰서 D 파출소 소속 순경 E, 순경 F으로부터 귀가를 권고 받자, “ 경찰, 좃 까고 꺼져, 개새끼들 아 ”라고 욕설을 하면서 위 E의 우측 손등을 손톱으로 할퀴고, 정강이를 발로 수회 걷어차고, 위 순경 F의 정강이를 발로 수회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to each relevant photograph;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on suspended execution (the confession and reflect of the defendant, the circumstances at the time of the crime of this case, and the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, etc.);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;