beta
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.02.03 2015가단26599

자동차 소유권이전등록 청구

Text

1. The defendant,

A. Attached Form from the plaintiff

1. On May 2010, 2010, 50 shares owned by the Plaintiff among the motor vehicles indicated above.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The primary cause of the claim is ① The Defendant, as a subsequent worship of the Plaintiff, concluded a sales contract on behalf of the Plaintiff on May 28, 2010 on behalf of the Plaintiff against the Plaintiff’s will on behalf of the former owner, and purchased the instant vehicle and completed the transfer of ownership as jointly owned by the Plaintiff and the former owner. As such, the sales contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the former owner is null and void.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure for ownership transfer on May 28, 2010 with respect to the shares in the name of the plaintiff as sought by the plaintiff on behalf of the former owner.

(2) On the other hand, the defendant, from May 28, 2010, operated the motor vehicle of this case by himself from the previous owner, and operated it independently by the defendant, and committed a large number of violations of public order

2. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are subject to a disposition of imposition of taxes and public charges (including fines for negligence) by an administrative agency as indicated in the foregoing, and thus, the obligation to pay the said taxes and public charges between the Plaintiff and the

B. As seen in the foregoing, the Defendant purchased the instant motor vehicle from the former owner and registered some of the shares in the name of the Plaintiff, which is based on a title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

The Plaintiff’s termination of the title trust agreement through the service of the duplicate of the instant complaint, and the Defendant’s acceptance of the transfer registration procedure on the instant motor vehicle from the Plaintiff due to the termination of title trust.

(2) As seen in the foregoing, from May 28, 2010 to May 28, 2010, the Defendant independently operated the instant motor vehicle and committed a large number of violations of public order and order.

2. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are subject to a disposition of imposition of taxes and public charges (including fines for negligence) by an administrative agency as indicated in the foregoing, and thus, the obligation to pay the said taxes and public charges between the Plaintiff and the

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings under the Civil Procedure Act.

참조조문