국가유공자및보훈보상대상자 요건비해당결정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 11, 201, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service as B’s major medicine soldier, and was discharged from active service on April 10, 2003. On December 17, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished service to the Defendant on December 17, 2013, by asserting that “the Escopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopic Espopics, Espopic Espopic Espopics
B. On July 28, 2014, the Defendant rendered a non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that, considering the medical opinions, etc. that the injury in the instant case was incurred in the performance of duties or during education and training, or that the occurrence or aggravation thereof was not recognized, in view of the medical opinions, etc. of the change of emulsion and emulative nature, the Defendant rendered a decision non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services
C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal on September 25, 2014, but was dismissed on December 9, 2014.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 5 evidence, Eul 1 to 11 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had a pain caused by salt salkin only once, and had a healthy condition, such as having no error in the draft physical prior to entering the hospital, and having no error in the draft physical for physical examination. On September 9, 201, the Plaintiff first met the right-hand part of the Gu newsletter among the education in the Gu newsletter on September 9, 201, and again, the instant difference occurred due to the Plaintiff’s display of a salpination in the Gu newsletter on September 13, 201, it is deemed that the instant difference occurred due to military duties or education and training, or that the instant accident was rapidly aggravated due to a natural progress or a
(b) from 1 to 5 evidence, 1 to 3, respectively.