정산금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,776,70 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from April 4, 2014 to June 19, 2014.
The Plaintiff’s primary claim on the cause of the claim is that, in the event that the Plaintiff concludes a facility guidance contract under the Defendant’s name and provides facility guidance, the Plaintiff agreed to pay 30% or 35% of the facility guidance fee deposited to the Defendant to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff provided facility guidance to 12 business entities indicated in the attached Form No. 1 of the attached Form No. 3 (hereinafter “instant calculation statement”). As such, the Plaintiff deposited the facility guidance fee to the Defendant as indicated in the attached Table No. 1 of the transaction details of the transaction place deposit statement as stated in the same table, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 26,324,00,000, out of the facility guidance fee deposited to the Defendant pursuant to the above settlement agreement.
According to the application for the amendment of the claim and the cause of the claim made on March 31, 2014, the Plaintiff appears to have claimed the agreement as the primary cause of claim on the premise that there was a settlement agreement that was applied from the previous date between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the conjunctively asserted that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to the settlement of accounts in the instant case as the statement of partition, and sought the amount for the cause of the agreement
Even if the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is not acknowledged, the name and deposit details, the details of accounts, the details of accounts receivable, and the unpaid amount of accounts are attached to the agreement on March 22, 2010 prepared by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant statement of accounts”). Since C signed by the Defendant’s representative, the Defendant is obliged to settle the unpaid facility guidance expenses under the instant statement of accounts.
Therefore, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 20,103,200 from the conjunctive claim to the following five of the 50 companies listed in the instant protocol of settlement of accounts. However, the Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 20,103,200 from among the 50 companies listed in the instant protocol of settlement.