In six months of imprisonment for A, B, and C, the defendant D shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000, and the defendant E and F shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

[Majority-related relationship] Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Ulsan District Court on October 5, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 30, 2016.

Defendant

H On October 18, 2016, the Ulsan District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, and was sentenced to two years in six months, and the judgment was finalized on October 26, 2016.

Defendant

On November 1, 2016, the J was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Ulsan District Court, and the judgment was finalized on January 13, 2017.

[2016 Highest 4383] No one shall provide for the distribution or use of, or display or store for, a game product which has not been rated, nor shall exchange, arrange for exchange or re-purchase of, any tangible or intangible result obtained through the use of the game product as a business, or engage in speculative business using any speculative machine.

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D’s joint crimes are joint owners operating an unauthorized game site in Ulsan-gu T and underground storage. Defendants B and Defendant D are employees in the above game site.

The Defendants conspired to share the role of making customers to receive customers, to manage game score points, and to exchange money without distinguishing them.

Accordingly, from November 16, 2015 to December 2, 2015, the Defendants installed 26 string currents and sea-based game machines, which are speculative gaming machines not classified by the Game Water Management Committee, in the said unauthorized warehouse game site, from November 16, 2015 to December 2, 2015, and used 10,000 won per point for customers to use the said game water, and exchanged the remainder after deducting 10% from the fees.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide a game machine which has not been rated, and exchange the result.