2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million on October 14, 2016 at the Jung-gu District Court for criminal facts that defame the Plaintiff’s reputation as follows.

(Li Government District Court 2016No1844). The above judgment became final and conclusive on October 22, 2016.

1) On June 25, 2015, the Defendant sent text messages to the occupants of Gyeyang-gu Seoul metropolitan apartment 105, stating that “the Plaintiff’s mother spreads the frame on the wall of the corridor before the Plaintiff’s mother, so that they are sleeped and slicked, and that the Plaintiff’s mother did not pay management expenses for 30 months, and that the Plaintiff’s mother was decided at the same representative meeting to bring a lawsuit immediately. If this is combined with the foregoing representative, it would be difficult for many residents to object to the Plaintiff, and if the Plaintiff continues to bring an issue, it would be possible for all other residents to object to the Defendant’s application for subsidy from 30 days to 5 days to 4 days to 5 days to 15 days to 4 days to 15 days to 3 others.”

3 The defendant has the honor to pay management expenses on August 8, 2015 to the same resident on the last day of each month.

The plaintiff No. 304, on the contrary of the 105 Dong residents and the Dong representatives, seems to be disqualified, and the part to be deposited to the plaintiff is returned to the plaintiff.

At present, the plaintiff is accused of the Goyang Police Station due to interference with business and defamation.

‘The text message’ refers to a text message.