However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant was living together with the victim C (V, 46 years of age) and about 5 years of age, and came to be hedging around April 2014.

After the Defendant was frightened with the Defendant, the Defendant was frightened that the victim was going to the examination room and the telephone was not well-known. On March 26, 2015, around 10:0, the Defendant 10:00, when the victim was frightd with the victim who was frightd with the restaurant proprietor at the Ecafeteria located in D, Gongju-si, and was frighted with the restaurant proprietor, then the Defendant frightd with the victim, who was frightd with the victim, “I fright, frighter, frighter, frighter, frighter, frightd with the victim’s face.” The Defendant frightddd with the victim’s head frightd with the victim’s fright

The Defendant continued to do so by cutting back the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing in the beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s right, and then cutting down two parts of the victim’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer, leading the victim into the twee’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer, leading the victim into the victim’s twee’s right side, and prevented the victim from escaping, and then, the Defendant mark’s beer’s beer’s ker’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s ker’s beer’s beer’s beer, and all kne’s ker’s ker’s ker’s beer’s beer’s beer’s ker’s beer’s bet.

As such, the Defendant used violence as a deadly weapon or dangerous object, thereby requiring approximately three weeks of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Bodily damaged photo;

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to investigation into telephone recording for victims C);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Discretionary mitigation is favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act.