계약이행보증금반환
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 100,000,000 as well as 20% per annum from October 28, 2014 to the date of full payment.
1. In full view of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the defendant did not dispute between the parties, or participated in the urban redevelopment project around 2003, such as participation in the Incheon-dong redevelopment project. From May 8, 2007, the defendant served as a director C for real estate consulting and multimedia product development project, etc., and on May 12, 2009, the plaintiff and the defendant entrusted the plaintiff with removal of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F buildings and G apartment reconstruction project (hereinafter “the reconstruction project of this case”), but at the time of refusal of the building permit, the plaintiff shall be paid KRW 100,000,000,000,000 to the defendant around April 23, 2009, and since May 12, 2009, the plaintiff could not have executed the reconstruction project of this case for the purpose of removing the contract of this case, and the plaintiff could not have executed the reconstruction project of this case for the purpose of removing the contract of this case.
Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from October 28, 2014 to the day following the delivery date of the instant payment order, which is obviously a day of the instant payment order, to the Plaintiff.
2. As to the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant paid all the Plaintiff’s money to H.