2. The judgment is recognized that the defendant led to the confession of all crimes, and repented his mistake, agreed with the injured victim, and received a letter from the injured police officer.

However, the crime of interference with the execution of official duties of this case is an act of assaulting a police officer who performs official duties and thus obstructing the performance of official duties, and thus, requires strict punishment in consideration of the recent situation of public authority. The defendant has been punished in several times due to violent crimes, drug crimes, etc., suspension of execution, and criminal punishment, and other factors such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes in this case, and all of the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.