However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. On March 15, 2016, from around 04:00 to 14:00, the Defendant, along with the person C and one name D, performed medication in a way that the Defendant passed through the water with the smoke emitted from the burning of the fire and inhales it by inserting about 0.5g grophones in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City from around 04:00 to around 14:00.

2. On March 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 06:00 around 06:0, the Defendant took a lawsuit for the purpose of administering approximately 0.2g of philopon in the I car, a vehicle owned by the Defendant at the front of the H main store located in Pyeongtaek-si G.

3. On March 15, 2016, at around 21:00, the Defendant issued one million won of the instant purchase price to the said “K” at the house of a name-free box called “K”, which is called the name-free box located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentJ, and sold one million won of the instant purchase price to the said “K.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A written confirmation of minor testing and reply to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the point of scopon medication, the choice of imprisonment), Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the point of purchase of scopon), Article 60 (1) 2, and Article 4 (1) 3 (b) (the choice of imprisonment), Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and Article 2 subparagraph 3 (b) (the selection of sentence) of the Narcotics Control Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Orders to observe protection and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The 2nd crime for which the sentencing of the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. for the reason of sentencing (the scope of recommendations) is based on the 3-type medication (the 3-year period from October to 2), the basic area (the 10-year period from October) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the scope of recommendations) (the 3-type (the 3-year period from October to 2).