If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On October 24, 2012, at around 18:00, the Defendant, while engaging in a dispute with D and D in front of the computer room in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the grounds that D and D were faced with the damaged party E (the age of 23).

At around 12:50 on the 25th day of the same month following the following day, the Defendant would be punished for trial expenses in relation to each other’s verbal dispute with the victim at C University New Engineering Officer 301, as seen above, on the ground that the victim’s horse was neglected, and the victim was sucked, plouted, and moved the victim’s right hand hand hand, followed the victim’s right hand hand, and moved the victim’s place to be frighted, one time at the right hand, and the victim’s head, back water, and fladd, flad, etc. of the victim’s head, back water, and flad, were taken as drinking, and the victim did so at the right side, which requires approximately five weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes described in the medical certificate of injury (investigative records No. 97, 98, 118 pages);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) there is no criminal power except where the Defendant was punished once by a fine for the crime of this kind; (b) there is no circumstance to consider the circumstance that the Defendant caused the instant crime by causing a verbal dispute with the victim; (c) the victim’s injury is heavy; (d) however, the Defendant paid a considerable amount to the victim and agreed smoothly with the victim; and (e) the Defendant recognizes the Defendant as a substitute for the crime of this case.