1. On January 29, 2017, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender from the background F, etc. F, etc., belonging to the Gyeonggi Seocheon Police Station E District of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station as an assault around 20:35 on January 29, 2017, and (b) unlawfully used his/her resident registration number as his/her own name in order to conceal the fact of his/her designation.

2. As the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the time, time, and place under Paragraph 1 above, the Defendant notified the Defendant’s name and resident registration number to obtain confirmation of his personal information, and made the F prepare a confirmation document, made the Defendant enter “G” in the column of confirmation in the color book, and marked the Defendant’s own seal on the next page.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, exercised the signature of the forged other person to F as if the signature was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Article 37 Subparag. 10 (Unlawful Use of Resident Registration Number, Selection of Imprisonment, Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of a private signature) of the relevant Act and the former Resident Registration Act (amended by Act No. 14286, Dec. 2, 2016); Article 239 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of a private signature) concerning criminal facts;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes committed the instant crime even though the Defendant had a record of serving a sentence for the same crime of forgery of signature, and the Defendant has been absent for a long time in the instant trial, and the Defendant is against the law.