In light of the following: (a) the Defendant made a false report that a check and a bill have been forged and falsified; (b) the Defendant issued a large number of checks with no possibility of settlement at the latest; and (c) additionally collected two copies of checks with false statement at the trial; (d) the amount of damage is significant since a check exceeding KRW 80 million has not been recovered until now; and (e) the Defendant did not pay damages to AA due to fraud; (b) the Defendant reported the alteration of a check and a bill; and (c) the Defendant issued an enforcement officer issued an order to keep the movable property, but caused damage to E upon the check and a bill to destroy it; and (d) the Defendant’s attitude of light of public authority, such as destroying the check and a bill and destroying it; and (e) taking account of various sentencing conditions shown in the instant argument, the lower judgment’s punishment is unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.