A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendants are elementary school students.

1. Defendant A

A. On October 8, 2017, the Defendant, at around 18:25, 2017, performed a cafeteria operated by the victim D (n, 61 years of age) located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and friendly B and pedago, but the Defendant did not sell the alcohol to the victim.

The reason for refusal is that “the victim is expressed and expressed” and assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s face one time by hand.

B. The Defendant damaged property at the above date, time, place, and the victim’s face fell from the floor, making the victim wear the part of the safe bridge, and continuously harming the victim’s utility, such as an influence and mixing with the victim’s market price, by continuously laying the composite machine on the floor.

(c)

Around 18:40 on October 8, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the restaurant operated above D, on the ground that a private person F in the police box affiliated with the Seoul Gwanak-gu Police Station E (Seoul Police Station) dispatched after receiving 112 a report would restrain the Defendant, and assault the above F’s face at one time, and by hand, the Defendant f’s head, head, fat, bat, and fat, fat, and bat the bat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers F on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

2. On October 8, 2017, Defendant B committed assault by Defendant B, on the grounds that Defendant F, in a restaurant operated above D’s operation around 18:40 on October 8, 2017, the police officer F arrested Defendant FF as Defendant-friendly A by obstructing the performance of official duties by obstructing the Defendant-friendly arrest of Defendant-friendly F, thereby committing assaulting Defendant F in his hand by breaking back the above F’s back water at one time, and bating his head and bat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers F on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the F damaged police officers' form of damage, harming the victim D, and on-site statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the point of assault on the crime (defendant A): Article 260 of the Criminal Act;