However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 13:30 on December 7, 2018, the Defendant discovered one of the Defendant’s 'DPC’s second floor in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the second floor of the CPC in B, and B found one of the Defendant’s 7,00 won in cash owned by the victim E, which was located adjacent to his/her table, 1,000 won in cash, 3, and 15,000 won in the market price with a juvenile card, and 15,000 won in the face of this, and the Defendant stored the above wall in the main machine on the Defendant’s own.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the property owned by the victim together with B.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by cutting off on-site CCTVs;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence), the reasons for sentencing, the restoration of damaged goods, the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime, the details of punishment for accomplices, the age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by the sentence, taking into account all the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument