업무방해등
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months;
2.Provided, That this judgment shall become final and conclusive, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who has a habit of drinking alcohol.
1. On June 8, 2017, at around 08:00, the Defendants are drinking alcoholic beverages together in the “F cafeteria” restaurant (business proprietor G) managed by the victim E located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant A, without any justifiable reason, dump the plastic beer box accumulated in the stairs of the place, and Defendant B, on the ground that Defendant B, without any reason, made a speech to change the drinking value from the damaged person.
The Defendant A saw the sound as “A,” and Defendant A conspired to interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force by putting the marbling of 2 beer, breaking up the floor by breaking up two beer who was on the table, and gathering the molecule’s disease, etc. for about 1 hour and 40 minutes.
2. The Defendants who interfered with the performance of official duties at the same place as No. 1 at around 09:40 on the same day, and listen to the police officer I belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station H police station, Seoul, which received 112 reports, that “it may interfere with the performance of his duties, so it may interfere with the performance of his duties.” Defendant A spit the above I’s chest with both descendants while taking a bath, and spit the Defendant B’s chest at one time on his hand. Defendant B spited the Defendant’s chest at the H police box located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and spited the Defendant B’s sound at one time, and walked the Defendant’s body with the same police officer’s assault that belongs to the same police officer, and spit the Defendant A’s body by walking the police officer at one time.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to criminal investigations and suppression of crimes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police statement made to I and E;
1. Each written statement L and K;
1. On-site photographs and CCTV video files;
1. Judgment.