However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Crimes related to the new purchase of mobile phones in 2012;

A. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: “E”, “F”, “G” and “G” and “B” in the column for payment of charges in the column for payment of charges to the bank column, “E”, “E”, “E in the Account Number column, “E”, “E”, “E in the Account Number column, “G”, “E”, “E in the Account Number column, “G”, “E”, “G” in the Account Number column, “E”, “G” in the Account Number column, “J”, “S”, serial number column, “K”, “E9,000 won”, “M”, “I” and “E”, “I” and “I” in the Model Name column, “F”, “I” and “F”, “I” and “I”, “I” and “I” immediately after the delivery of the new service charges in the Account Number column.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of a new T service contract in the name of E, which is a private document on the duty of rights, and continuously forged one copy of the contract for secondary purchase of a device and one copy of the LTE discount subscription certificate by the same method.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, submitted to the members of the D mobile phone store who are aware of the forgery, a service new contract, a short-term installment contract, or a LET flus discount certificate as if it were a document duly formed.

(c)

The Defendant was in custody of the Defendant at the same time and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, each copy of a new T service contract, a single copy of a contract, or a LTE flus discount;

The E's resident registration certificate is submitted and the defendant has a legitimate right to open a mobile phone in the name of E.