beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.14 2015고단1896

위증

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 10, 2014, at the court of Seoul Central District Court 560, located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 157, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the invalidation of the resolution to dismiss the Plaintiff E and the Defendant F, the Defendant, the Defendant, at the court of Seoul Central District Court 560, 157, at the center of Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court 560, the Defendant was aware of the Plaintiff’s agent’s “the Plaintiff was a meal on September 3, 2012, and was dissolved with the participants after all of the events were completed.” The witness knows such fact.

The term “interpellation” is not “assumed.”

The testimony was made, and the plaintiff's representative "the witness was instructed on October 9, 2012 to I, and the plaintiff was unable to work in his/her office because he/she was locked the door of the plaintiff's office.

I will not memory the question "...."

The testimony was made.

However, the defendant was well aware of the fact that E introduced corporate director as the Secretary General and took place until the exercise is completed in the course of the corporate acquisition and audit, and it was well aware of the defendant's instruction that E was unable to properly perform his duties.

As above, Defendant 1 made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Statement of the witness E and H in the third public trial records;

1. Each protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of the accused by the prosecution (including the E and H substitute part);

1. A statement of H (the sequence 23-15 of evidence list);

1. Seoul High Court Decision 2014Na 40574 Judgment (Evidence List 20);

1. Statement of examination of the witness by the Seoul Central District Court 2012 Gohap 90592 (Evidence No. 23-1)

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (part of protocol of pleadings No. 8 on April 10, 2014 and list of evidence No. 3);

1. Written Answer (as 2012k, 2492 K-WO and 2492 K-WO Nos. 10-3 of evidence list);

1. Each recording book (the sequence 9, 23-18 of the evidence list);

1. J. M.