An application for remedy by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who carries out interior or remodelling works, such as apartment, Bara, etc., in the name of “E” in the name of “E” at the time of the racing.

A. On March 23, 2013, the Defendant, at the above “E” office around March 23, 2013, would allow the victim F to undertake remodeling construction works if the construction cost is the cost.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the cost of construction is paid from the injured party, the intention or ability to complete the remodeling work was written to repay the existing debt or use it for living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to complete the remodeling work because the injured party was willing to have retired from the construction to a certain extent.

The Defendant, on March 23, 2013, suffered from damage, KRW 1 million around March 23, 2013, and the same year

3. 25. Minority KRW 18 million, and the same year.

4. Around 19.10 million won and a total of 32 million won have been transferred as a construction cost.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On May 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on May 1, 2013, G Borrowing C, 301, the victim H, as down payment, would compel the Defendant to implement the remodeling construction by borrowing KRW 4 million in the face-to-face.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the cost of construction is paid from the injured party, it was time to use it for living expenses, etc., and there was no idea to start the work, so there was no intention or ability to complete the remodeling work.

On May 2, 2013, the Defendant received 4 million won as the down payment from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

(c)

On July 23, 2013, the Defendant would have the victim C undertake the remodeling construction work of apartment in apartment units I 716 at the time of the racing, I 716.

A false statement was made.

However, even if the construction cost is paid from the injured party, the work was intended to repay the existing debt or use it for living expenses, etc., and there was no intention or ability to complete the remodeling work because he/she had no intention or ability to complete the remodeling work because he/she was willing to retire while continuing the construction work

The defendant.