beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.10 2016고단2259

사기등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendants violated the Labor Standards Act, along with the JJ, conspired with the Defendants to acquire employment fees from public agencies or large enterprises, such as the Seo-gu Office of Gwangju, the National Asian Culture Center, and the laba, etc., and to acquire them by taking advantage of the connection formed by Defendant B and J activities as if they could be employed by public agencies or large enterprises.

Defendant

A around April 2013, around Dong-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, called "A" to the victim K to employ L by a person engaging in political activities to a car.

However, in fact, the defendants and the J had the purpose of using them for personal purposes by dividing them into the amount of employment, and they did not have the authority or ability to employ them to public agencies or large enterprises.

In collusion with J on May 1, 2013, the Defendants: (a) by deceiving the Victim K; (b) received a total of KRW 30 million from the victim K on two occasions at the road roadsides in the vicinity of the Yadong, Seo-gu, Seodong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju around September 30, 2014; and (c) obtained a total of KRW 230 million from the victim 5, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Form from September 30, 2014; and (d) obtained the delivery of KRW 230,000,000 from the victim 5 to the employment of others

2. Defendant A

A. On November 2014, Defendant A calls the victimO at the N office located in the Southern-gu Seoul metropolitan area to call the victimO for the violation of the Act on Fraud and Labor Standards. Defendant A said, “The number of 50 million won to be employed for the arche-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si”

However, in fact, Defendant A had the purpose of using the card payment for personal purposes such as receiving money from the victimO, and there was no intention or ability to employ the victimO as a motor vehicle.

Defendant

A shall be as above.