2. Determination

A. According to the records, the court below determined punishment in consideration of various sentencing reasons, such as the fact that there are a large number of crimes and a large amount of damage, but has not yet been recovered from damage, that there are several records of punishment for the same kind of crime, that there are several errors, that there is a penation and rebuttal, and that there are health conditions.

B. Although there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment as the new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial court, and considering the various reasons revealed in the oral proceedings, the lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate and it does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

C. Therefore, the argument of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.