beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.02.17 2016고정671

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding seven hundred thousand won;

2. Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30, the Cheongju-si, the Cheongju-si, and (b) was under the influence of 0.053% alcohol concentration in blood, and (c) was driven from the suna-si, the Cheongju-si, the Mana-si, the Mana-si was under the influence of 0.053%

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the situation of a driver driving under influence of alcohol;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the selective punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the part not guilty (the part concerning the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents) of the Criminal Act concerning the detention in a workhouse;

1. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving vehicles C.

On July 3, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.053% of alcohol level in the blood while driving the said vehicle in front of the Seocho-gu So-gu So-dong So-dong Confection apartment on July 3, 2016, and the Defendant was under the influence of 0.053% of the alcohol level in the blood.

The point of accident is the intersection where traffic control is performed and there is a non-protective left-hand turn sign in the direction where the defendant runs, so the driver has a duty of care to confirm whether there is a vehicle driven in the opposite direction, and to accurately operate the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of left-hand turn, the victim E was in a straight line with the FOtoba, and the victim E was forced to use the clibly operated (non-folding) and the center of the road in order to avoid the collision.

In the end, the above negligence caused injury to the victim, such as kne kne kne et al. on the treatment days.

2. This part of the judgment is based on the premise that the injured party suffered an injury due to the instant traffic accident, and this part of the judgment is examined.

3.2