2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with respect to A (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded the automobile insurance contract with respect to B (hereinafter “Defendant”).

나. 원고 차량의 운전자는 2016. 2. 1. 08:10경 인천 중구 운서동 인천국제공항 장기주차장 내에서 노면에 표시되어 되어 있는 좌회전 지시를 무시하고 교차로에 진입하여 직진하던 중 원고 차량 진행방향의 우측에서 직진하던 피고 차량이 원고 차량의 오른쪽 뒷문짝 부분을 피고 차량의 전면부로 들이받았고, 이에 튕겨 나간 원고 차량이 교차로 앞에서 이중주차 되어 있던 C 차량(이하 ‘피해차량’이라 한다)을 충격하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On March 14, 2016, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,854,00 as repair cost for damaged vehicles due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 5, video and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted that the accident in this case occurred concurrently with the negligence of the plaintiff and the defendant vehicle. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay 70% of the above repair cost to the plaintiff who acquired the damage claim against the defendant vehicle in accordance with the insurer subrogation legal principles.

In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the accident of this case occurred by the whole negligence of the plaintiff vehicle that entered the intersection, disregarded the surface direction, and contributed to expanding the damage of the victim vehicle, the negligence of the victim vehicle should be considered.

B. The following circumstances, which can be recognized by each of the above evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff’s vehicle should turn to the left.