학교폭력대책자치위원회결과통지처분취소청구
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for revocation against the disposition of “five hours of special education for parents” is dismissed.
2...
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff and E were enrolled in the fifth and fifth grade of the D Middle School in 2018.
B. On April 23, 2018, the Defendant continuously led two or more students, including the Plaintiff, to the victim E (hereinafter “victims”), and led to the formation of a collective bullying atmosphere, the Defendant issued a disposition of suspension of attendance as an emergency leading measure against the Plaintiff, who is the aggressor student, pursuant to Article 17(4) of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence in Schools (hereinafter “School Violence Prevention Act”).
C. On May 10, 2018, the D Middle School School Violence Countermeasures autonomous committee (hereinafter “autonomous committee meeting”) held on May 10, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant autonomous committee meeting”) confirmed the above suspension of attendance and decided to take measures against the Plaintiff on the following grounds: (a) the seriousness, sustainability, and intentionality of school violence is very high and the degree of reflection and reconciliation is very low; (b) pursuant to Article 17 of the Act on the Prevention of School Violence (Article 17 of the Act on the Prevention of School Violence (Article 1(8)); (c) the Plaintiff’s contact with the victimized students; (d) the prohibition of taking special education (Article 10(3)); and (e) the number of hours of special education for parents (Article 9(9).
판단요소 판정점수 (0∼4점) 근거 심각성 4점 켁켁 거릴 정도로 위험하게 목을 심하게 졸랐다는 피해학생의 진술과 관련 목격학생의 진술이 일치한 점 등을 고려한 결과, 위원 6명 중 5명이 ‘매우 높음(4점)’을 준 사실을 반영 지속성 4점 3월초부터 사안 보고 전까지 거의 매일 놀리며, 상황을 주도한 점 등을 고려한 결과, 위원 6명 중 5명이 ‘매우 높음(4점)’을 준 사실을 반영 고의성 4점 우발적으로 사안이 아니고, 피해학생이 소리를 질러야 괴롭힘을 멈추는 등을 고려한 결과, 위원 6명 중 5명이 ‘매우 높음(4점)’을 준 사실을 반영 반성정도 4점 공개된 장소이고,...