However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 21, 2017, around 23:36, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant at Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, B 101 Dong 401, and as a matter of the charge of credit card fees, the Defendant raised a dispute over the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of the charge of assault against the above C at around 00:07, Nov. 22, 2017 by a police officer who was dispatched to the site with the Defendant’s 112 report, was arrested as a current offender.

On November 22, 2017, at around 00:15, the Defendant was transferred to the Criminal System of 138 Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon Police Station, and the Defendant took charge of the fact that he was the Defendant’s pro-Japanese job team office, and was investigated by the police officers on the basis of crime motive, etc., on November 22, 2017, after receiving a written confirmation on the arrest of flagrant offenders from the police officers, and was perused on November 22, 2017, and without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to exercise the certificate, then forged the signature of the above “D” by writing the signature of the other person on the “written confirmation” on the “written confirmation” column without authority, and used the signature by issuing the said written confirmation to the police officers of the Yeonsu-gu Police Station, who knew of such circumstances, as if the above signature was genuine.

2. At around 11:20 on December 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) under investigation with the status of the suspect due to the foregoing instant case at the Yeonsu Police Station, and completed the investigation, and thereafter, (b) stated “D” another’s signature in the column of the statement in the suspect interrogation protocol without authority to peruse and exercise the protocol; (c) forged the signature with the seal affixed thereon; and (d) exercised a forged signature by issuing the said protocol to G of the Yeonsu Police Station G and Assistant H, who is aware of such circumstance, as if the said signature was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the letter of arrest of flagrant offenders (D), written confirmation (D), and written interrogation of suspects (D);

1. Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of view of signing the company’s signature) and Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of view of exercising the above investigation’s signature) regarding criminal facts.