beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.29 2017고단1583

준강제추행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim E (n.e., 18 years old) are two times after the line of Dong-ri, such as F University.

At around 00:30 on May 20, 2016, the Defendant, while drunkd the victim from the F University located in Seocheon-si G, was fluencing the victim to commit an indecent act against the victim while going outside the school. At the H District adjoining the wall in the vicinity, the Defendant was flucing the victim, who is expected to be able to resist from alcohol, and was flucing the victim at the wall in the vicinity of the G University, and was flucing the victim’s bridge, the chest, and the chest of the victim who cannot resist from alcohol on the wall in the vicinity of the F University. In addition, the Defendant continued to flucing the victim, who was unable to resist due to alcohol in the front of the F University dormitory.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by using the victim's resistanceable condition.

[The defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged the fact that the defendant met the victim's bridge in the I Park Convene, but there was no fact that the defendant gets the victim in H District part, and ② there was no fact that the victim's chest was satch in the I Park Convene, ③ there was no fact that the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her b

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant can be found to have committed an indecent act against the victim by committing all acts as stated in its reasoning.

The defendant and defense counsel are without merit.

1) The victim stated specifically the fact that the police and the prosecution committed an indecent act.

The statement on the circumstances before and after the defendant's act and the situation before and after it, the reason why it was judged that it was not a elblue or elb is specific and reliable.

2) On September 2016, the victim had an interview with the subject of the “J” and “Loss,” and expressed his memory of the instant indecent act, etc., and the content thereof.