The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a 125cc motor bicycle without registration.

On September 24, 2017, the Defendant driven a bicycle with a motor device around 21:10, and proceeded ahead of the Japanese church located in the Seo-dong of Busan, Seo-gu, Busan, with the speed of about 50 km from the intersection to the intersection at the speed of about 50 km.

Since there is a road where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant neglected to proceed with the vehicle driving signal while driving as it is, the Defendant got the victim C (66 years old) who crosses the road to the Japanese church from the apartment site to the right side of the direction of the defendant's running, and received the victim C (66 years old) as the front part of the motor system bicycle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as finite finites, in need of treatment for about five weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 3(1) and the proviso of Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act [the scope of the punishment recommended in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (4-1 year or more) of the type of ordinary traffic accident (the sentencing guidelines) [the decision of sentence] / [the decision of sentence] the defendant shocks the pedestrians who have dried up the crosswalk near the crosswalk in violation of the signals in violation of the signals, even though the degree of the victim's injury is not less than that of the victim's injury, no effort is made to agree with or compensate the victim for damage, and no mandatory insurance is subscribed.

The arguments of this case are shown in the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.