150,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, around February 4, 2017, around 15:00, the Defendant: (a) sold a single-use injection device with approximately 0.21g of mematic drugs (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) located in the E car parked near “D theater” located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan; and (b) sold a philopon with the delivery of approximately 0.21g of melopon to E.

On March 8, 2018, F Co-Defendant F, a co-Defendant, dismissed the public prosecution on March 20, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copy of each written investigation of suspect with respect to E;

1. The application of the investigative report (3,9) and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the price list of narcotics, etc.;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection of and Management of Narcotics, Etc. for Crimes ( punished by imprisonment)

1. Reasons for sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. [the scope of the recommended sentence] medication, simple possession, etc., within the scope of the above sentence range according to the sentencing guidelines (10 months to 2 years) in the basic area (10 months from 10 months to 3 years) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the decision of sentencing) / [the decision of sentencing]. The crime of this case was committed by the defendant in the relation with E, and thus, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant in the relation with E, and thus, it is extremely bad that the crime was committed.