2. There are favorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession of a crime, the fact that there was no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the transfer of a cash card, and the suspension of account after this mold to prevent additional damage, and the Defendant’s failure to obtain economic benefits due to the instant crime.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the cash card transferred by the Defendant to a third party was used in the so-called licensing, causing damage to several victims; (b) there is a need to strictly punish the relevant crimes depending on the trend of intelligence of licensing or licensing; (c) equity with the sentencing of other cases similar to the instant crime; (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.