도로교통법위반(음주운전)
1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million;
2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, only one hundred thousand won.
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On August 22, 2007, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Housing Site, respectively. On August 19, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 4 months and 2 years of suspended execution for the same crime in the official capital support of the Daejeon District Court.
【Criminal Facts】 On October 3, 2014, the Defendant driven B the vehicle with approximately KRW 500 meters from the front of a cafeteria in the mutual influoral fluoral fri in Pyeongtaek-Eup to the front of the same Eup fluoral fluoral fluoral flusium, while under the influence of alcohol around 0.193% of alcohol level.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry records, and application of each statute of the judgment;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that there is no room for her wife in that he/she committed the instant crime even though he/she had reached several times of the same punishment for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order, and even during the current suspension period, even though he/she committed the instant crime, there is no room for her wife in that he/she committed the instant crime. However, there is a harsh aspect, such as where a sentence is imposed on the Defendant after six years have passed since the confession of the crime, and where a sentence is imposed on the Defendant, the sentence should be imposed to the imprisonment for which the execution of the suspended sentence has been invalidated and suspended. In addition, considering the