beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.12.11 2013고단1479

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 19:20 on July 28, 2013 to 19:58 on the same day, the Defendant boarded B buses at the hydro-dong bus stops located in Jeju-do, and laid down the shoulder part above the victim’s shoulder until he drops down at the bus stops in the KBS Broadcasting Station located in Jeju-si, and pushed down the shoulder part above the victim’s shoulder until he drops down at the bus stops located in Jeju-si, and committed an indecent act by force by driving the part of the unhullbbbbbbs located in the part of the victim’s right-hand buckbs attached to the brea-dobbbbs located in the front and rear of the brea-dong bus stops.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (investigation into CCTV of bus vehicles and confirmation of the raise of suspects);

1. Relevant Articles on criminal facts and Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes elective Crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Where the judgment in this case becomes final and conclusive with respect to a defendant who shall submit personal information under Article 16(2) and (3) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order, the defendant constitutes a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Articles 43 and 43(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information

However, the disclosure order of registered information needs to be prudent in that it may have a serious impact on the rehabilitation of the defendant, and in this case, it seems that the registration of personal information alone can have an effect to prevent recidivism of the defendant. Thus, the defendant does not issue an order or notification of the registration information disclosure to the defendant.