정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Each indictment against the Defendants is dismissed.
1. The Defendants of the facts charged conspired with the victim, who unilaterally cut off the phone call with the victim C by a workplace guide company, while the Defendant had a counseling with the victim C, to put up comments on the malicious comments.
Defendants around September 17:56, 2015, at their own offices located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, Defendant A, in the column of comments on the Internet website of the next site E real estate brokerage agent (F) website, was fully different from the land they shown in the G-E site itself, and even if they were to be satisfyed, they were satisfyed in the H-Anth, and were satisfyed in the H-Anth, and they were satisfyed, so far as they were satisfyed and falsely sold in the H-Anth, too late.
Manman Manman Mahman Mahman Mahman Hahman Hahman Hahman
The author puts comments on comments.
Defendant
B는 "I -야 이 썅년아, 고발할 거다,
As a result of interference with the work, I would like to say that it was proper drinking, J-stroke, stroke and stroke, and that it was first considered by a malicious certified broker.
As a result, the Defendants damaged the reputation of victims through information and communications networks for the purpose of slandering by publishing false information in order to inflict damage on the victims' real estate business.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 70(3) of the same Act.
However, after the instant prosecution was instituted, the victim C withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendants on January 4, 2016.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.