However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 02:00 on December 24, 2015, the Defendant received 112 report that the police box belonging to the Suwonnam Police Station D, which was sent to the site and took a bath for the surrounding persons at a large interest of the site, and told the petitioner and the above E at a time twice the chest part of the chest part of the chest part of the said E at a time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that there is no basic area (6 to 14 months), the basic area (6 to 6 months), and the basic area (6 to 14 months) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the degree of violence and the previous conviction and the fact that there is no previous conviction exceeding the same kind of crime and fine).