A shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won, and by a fine of 500,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

1. On May 29, 2017, Defendant A, at around 11:00 on May 29, 2017, she stolen the victim’s property from the victim’s property, she loaded the victim’s property 28,000 won at the victim’s market price, which the victim F set down on the road by the victim F, on the road.

2. Defendant B, in the manner described in paragraph 1 at the time, at the place, and in the manner described in paragraph 1 at the same time, carried the Defendant’s vehicle license, driving approximately 43.8 km away from the Defendant’s residence, with the Defendant’s driver’s license, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s property by driving approximately 43.8 km away from the Defendant’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses (the second page, No. 49 of evidence records);

1. Investigation reports (investigation into confirmation of the sources of sphode and sphobane);

1. Investigation reports (on-site CCTV investigations);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the attachment of each photograph (No. 2, No. 14 through 17, 23 of the evidence record);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Defendant A who is subject to the option of a fine, Defendant B who is subject to the option of a fine: Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 152 Subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of a fine, respectively;

1. Aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. The defendants of the provisional payment order: Judgment on the defendants B and the defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant B and his defense counsel argued that the driver’s license is not necessary at the sales store at the time of the purchase of the instant private-wheeled Bab, and that the warning letter attached to the above Oral Bab was also manufactured and thus, Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion on the above Oral Bab, and that the driver’s license is not necessary.

As stated in “the above Defendant is believed to have no need to obtain a license in driving the above Oral Ba.”