However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 06:35 on May 14, 2013, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting approximately 30 minutes of the alcohol measuring instrument in a manner that makes it difficult for the Defendant to recognize that the Defendant driven a Ctoscar car under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, snicking, snicking, etc. from the slope belonging to D Zone D District of the Daegu East Police Station D District of the Daegu East Police Station, while driving the Ctoscar under the influence of alcohol.

However, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol testing without any justifiable reason by evading it through a means that he or she takes a bath to a police officer and refuses to take a drinking test.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The circumstantial report of an employee;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, which require the measurement of alcohol;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the grounds of the order to provide community service and to attend a compliance driving lecture is important, but there is no criminal conviction or heavier than a suspended sentence, and the defendant's age and occupation and other normal materials revealed in the trial process shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentence.