요양불승인처분취소
1. On July 29, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval for medical care rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 10, 2015, the Plaintiff joined the Mutual Association B and worked in the freezing warehouse from June 2015. On January 15, 2016, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “Rano-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Mad-Ma (hereinafter “instant injury”).
B. On July 29, 2016, the Defendant rendered a non-approval disposition of the application for medical care benefits (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that “the color change of the skin was not visible from the coolant test, and the period of service at the freezing warehouse is merely about eight months and it is difficult to regard the instant injury and disease as the period of harmful exposure. Therefore, it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the injury and the injury and the injury, and it is difficult to recognize the causal relationship between the injury and the injury and the injury.”
C. The Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a request for review with the Defendant, but was dismissed, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee filed a request for reexamination, but dismissed.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5 through 9, 15, 17, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff was exposed to the environment that the Plaintiff had been engaged in product manufacturing operations, etc. at a freezing warehouse of about two hours a day, at least 2 hours a day, and that caused the occurrence of low damage, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a result of the Rano cans inspection.
The defendant's disposition of this case which rejected the plaintiff's application on the ground that the color change in the above prosecutor's application is not confirmed even though the cooling load test is not an essential prosecutor for the diagnosis of the Rano-Madon War.
(b) The Rano-Madar Ma, 1) Radar Madar Madar Madar Madar Madar Madar Madar Madon is exposed to the low-level environment due to the stimulic blood control or higher function.