Seized evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 shall be confiscated from the accused.

[Criminal Justice] On April 2, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for night buildings, intrusions, larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on April 2, 2009 and two months from September 24, 2009 as a matter of night building intrusion and larceny at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 24, 2009, and completed the execution of each of the above punishment on August 16, 2010 and seven times the same criminal records.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendant returned to the stores located in the subway station during the new wall time when surveillance was neglected for the purpose of preparing living expenses, etc. without any particular property or income, and tried to steals cash, tobacco, etc. stored in the safe, which can be disposed of, and stored in the safe, by means of destroying the correction device of the entrance using the drone.

On February 6, 2013, at around 02:40, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the corrective device attached to the entrance by using the dracker (42 cm in total length) held in advance at the e shop operated by the victim D, which was operated by the Defendant at the e shop located within the Dac Station C, and invaded into the store, and took 170,000 won in cash, which was owned by the victim in the safe; and (b) from January 21, 2013 to January 21, 2013.

3. 1. Between 1. up to 1.0, a total of KRW 5,130,500 was stolen by the same method, such as in the annexed list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement on F, G, D, H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P;

1. A written statement of Q;

1. A report on damage to the R;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Investigation report (entry/entry/explic photo of destruction of locking devices), investigation report (use of transportation cards), investigation report (S damage report);

1. Seized articles and photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Habituality of the judgment: dampness is recognized in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the same kind of crimes committed several times in a short period of time as indicated in the judgment. The application of statutes 1.