손해배상(기)
1. Defendant E: (a) 5% per annum from January 7, 2014 to May 16, 2017 with respect to each of the above five thousand won and each of the above money to the Plaintiffs.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff’s organization is a non-corporate body as a civil movement organization established for the purpose of taking part in the country’s sovereignty and the elimination of new neo-dominism, etc. through the collective collective and collective strike, with the aim of promoting the unification of the citizens, such as workers, farmers, and the poor, and the public. The Plaintiff is a person selected as one of the full-time representatives of the Plaintiff’s organization on February 7, 2015.
B. Defendant C (hereinafter “C”) is a composite cable broadcasting company that broadcasts the implication program “D news shock” (hereinafter “D”) and Defendant D is the executor of the instant program.
C. At around 17:35 on December 31, 2013, H attempted to kill a person at a low level on the same day and was transferred to J Hospital on the same day, but died on the following day.
(hereinafter “H’s suicide case”). D.
Defendant C intended to broadcast the H’s program as its subject, and recorded Defendant D and Defendant E’s interviewed broadcast, who is an agent of the instant program, in interference with Defendant E, and broadcasted the program as TV on January 7, 2014. Around January 16, 2014, Defendant D and Defendant E broadcasted the filmed broadcast of the instant program as of TV, and the summary of the interviewed content of Defendant D and Defendant E, which were broadcasted at the time of the instant program, are as shown in the attached Form.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3
2. The parties' assertion
A. The Defendants asserted that the Plaintiffs’ assertion committed an act of undermining the Plaintiffs’ social assessment by explicitly indicating facts or false facts on the premise that the Plaintiffs were notified in advance of the death of H in the instant program and did not know it without knowing it, or actively using H’s decentralization in political terms.
Therefore, the Defendants are jointly obligated to pay the Plaintiffs KRW 10,000,000 as damages due to defamation.
B. Summary of the Defendants’ assertion 1 Defendant E along with the Plaintiffs’ past behavior and behavior in the instant program.